Research projects
SCIR conducts applied and academic research funded by grants from the European Commission, the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), private contracts, and other sources. Our project portfolio focuses on digital transformation, governance, integrity of data, and practical solutions that support organisational resilience and evidence based decision making.
Rating And Index
More Than Our Rank
OÜ “Scientific Center of Innovative Research” is a supporting organisation of the More Than Our Rank initiative promoted by the International Network of Research Management Societies (INORMS). More Than Our Rank encourages institutions to broaden how they describe success by recognising activities, achievements, and ambitions that are not captured by global university rankings. Within this perspective, SCIR treats the initiative as a methodological foundation that informed the development of FDL-ULI as a competence-oriented ranking with transparent evidence standards and outcome-based measurement.
University Leadership Ranking in Financial and Digital Literacy (FDL-ULI)
Context. Our engagement with More Than Our Rank was the starting point for a broader shift in how we conceptualise and measure institutional success. Building on the initiative’s call to look beyond traditional league tables, SCIR developed the University Leadership Ranking in Financial and Digital Literacy (FDL-ULI) as a practical, evidence-based instrument focused on competences that matter for responsible participation in the digital economy.
Purpose. To assess and compare how universities demonstrate leadership in developing financial literacy and digital literacy as transversal competences, and to translate results into actionable recommendations for institutional improvement, curriculum design, and public policy.
Methodology. FDL-ULI applies a two-component model that combines verifiable institutional evidence with measurable student outcomes. Component A evaluates institutional capacity through a structured audit of official university web resources and publicly available documents, using a transparent rubric and evidence requirements. Component B measures learning outcomes through an annual standardised student assessment aligned with EU competence frameworks, using stratified sampling and applied, case-based tasks. Composite scores are calculated through documented weighting rules, supported by quality assurance, transparency requirements, and an appeals procedure.
Outputs. Annual ranking and analytical report; full methodology and codebook; institutional profiles with component scores and improvement recommendations; partner benchmarking briefings and capacity-building workshops.
Collaboration. We invite universities, academic networks, municipalities, NGOs, and responsible private-sector partners to participate as data partners, pilot institutions, expert reviewers, or dissemination partners.
Contact. For participation or partnership requests, please contact office@scnchub.com
Data Verification and Fact-checking Lab
The Data Verification and Fact-checking Lab helps partners publish analysis that can be trusted, reused, and defended. We combine rigorous source validation with transparent documentation so that datasets, claims, and citations remain consistent across reports, grant applications, and public communications. Our protocols are designed to reduce reputational and compliance risks while strengthening research integrity, auditability, and reproducibility.
Purpose. The Data Verification and Fact-checking Lab as a part of SCIR strengthens the reliability, credibility, and decision usefulness of research and analytical outputs by verifying datasets, factual claims, and source integrity used in reports, grant proposals, policy briefs, academic manuscripts, and public communications. It is designed to reduce the risk of reputational damage, methodological bias, and unintended dissemination of incorrect or manipulated information, while improving transparency and accountability across research and governance processes. The Lab supports both pre publication quality assurance and post publication clarification when stakeholders request evidence based validation.
Workflow. The Lab follows a structured verification protocol aligned with research integrity and practical audit logic. Core stages include source authentication and provenance tracing, cross source triangulation, internal consistency and plausibility checks, metadata and version control review, and the creation of a documented audit trail that records each verification step, decision point, and supporting evidence. Where relevant, the Lab applies integrity screening to detect potential manipulation patterns, anomalies, duplication, or selective reporting, and it assesses whether results are reproducible given the available data, methods, and documentation. For complex cases, the workflow includes risk based prioritisation of claims, calibration of verification depth to the stakes of the decision, and a clear classification of findings such as confirmed, partially confirmed, inconclusive, or refuted.
Outputs. Deliverables include concise fact checking memos with a claim by claim verdict, evidence references, and recommended corrections; verified datasets accompanied by documentation packages (data dictionary, cleaning log, methodology note, and limitations statement); transparency annexes for reports and proposals that explain data sources, assumptions, and validation steps; and targeted recommendations on data governance, quality assurance, and responsible communication. When appropriate, the Lab can provide a verification checklist for teams, templates for documentation, and guidance on strengthening internal controls for future reporting cycles.
Collaboration. We work with research teams, journals and conferences, public sector partners, NGOs, universities, and organisations that publish analytical materials or rely on evidence for strategic decisions. Collaboration can take the form of one off verification requests, ongoing support across a project lifecycle, independent review for sensitive communications, or capacity building for internal fact checking practices.
Contact. To request a verification or discuss a tailored workflow, please contact office@scnchub.com.
COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology)
COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) is a European framework that supports international research networks by funding coordination activities rather than research itself. COST enables researchers, innovators, and practitioners from different countries to collaborate through thematic Actions, facilitating knowledge exchange, methodological alignment, and capacity building. Its main objective is to strengthen European research and innovation by connecting disciplines, supporting early career researchers, and translating scientific knowledge into societal and policy relevant impact.
Members of the SCIR team are actively involved in COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) and participate in a number of COST Actions that align with our research and applied priorities in digital transformation, finance, and societal change. In particular, team members contribute to the following COST Actions:
- COST Action CA20130. European MIC Network, New paths for science, sustainability and standards (Euro-MIC), which focuses on interdisciplinary approaches to standards, sustainability, and scientific cooperation.
- COST Action CA19130. Fintech and Artificial Intelligence in Finance, Towards a transparent financial industry (FinAI), addressing the impact of fintech and artificial intelligence on transparency and resilience in the financial sector.
- COST Action CA21107. Work inequalities in later life redefined by digitalization (DIGI-net), which examines how digitalization reshapes work-related inequalities in later life.
Participation in these and other COST Actions enables the SCIR team to integrate European research perspectives into its projects, engage in joint studies and methodological exchange, and contribute to policy-relevant and socially impactful outcomes.
Erasmus+
SCIR participates in Erasmus+ projects as a research and implementation partner focused on the digital economy, digital society, and adult education. Our work supports the development and assessment of transversal competences, including financial literacy, digital literacy, and media literacy, with an emphasis on practical learning outcomes and scalable educational solutions.
A key SCIR priority within Erasmus+ is fraud prevention and digital resilience. We contribute methodologies, training content, and applied scenarios that help learners and institutions recognise manipulation, misinformation, and financial fraud, and strengthen responsible behaviour in digital environments.
SCIR actively contributes to Erasmus+ projects as a research and implementation partner focused on competence development and evidence based innovation in education and training. Our participation is grounded in the intersection of digital economy and digital society, where rapid technological change requires new models of learning, governance, and responsible behaviour. Within Erasmus+ cooperation formats, SCIR supports the design of project logic, methodological frameworks, stakeholder engagement, and quality assurance, with an emphasis on measurable learning outcomes and practical impact for target groups.
A core priority for SCIR is adult education and lifelong learning, especially in contexts where digital transformation reshapes labour markets, public services, and financial decision making. We work on developing competence frameworks, training modules, and learning pathways that strengthen financial literacy, digital literacy, and media literacy as transversal skills. In practice, this includes curriculum design, development of learning materials, pilot testing with adult learners, and evaluation strategies that enable partners to demonstrate progress and scale successful solutions across institutions and countries.
SCIR also contributes expertise in fraud prevention and anti fraud awareness as an integral part of digital resilience. We support Erasmus+ initiatives that address online risks, manipulation, misinformation, and financial fraud by integrating risk based learning scenarios, behavioural components, and communication strategies. This direction is aligned with the broader objective of strengthening trust in digital environments, improving consumer protection, and supporting responsible participation in the digital economy.
Across Erasmus+ projects, SCIR typically delivers research based content, methodological tools, and dissemination outputs, including evidence guidelines, assessment instruments, policy oriented briefs, and capacity building workshops for partner organisations. We also promote transparent documentation standards and data quality principles to ensure that project results remain credible and reusable beyond the funding period. Through these contributions, SCIR helps transform project ideas into structured, implementable, and measurable interventions that respond to contemporary challenges of digital transformation and societal resilience.
Private contracts and grants
Projects we are working on:
NoFakeFinance: Youth Media Literacy for Financial Narratives Online
NoFakeFinance is a cross-border media literacy initiative designed to enhance young people’s capacity to critically assess financial information and economic narratives circulating across social media and digital communication platforms. In recent years, misleading investment advice, influencer-promoted “quick profit” schemes, and emotionally charged economic narratives have increasingly shaped online discourse, influencing young people’s decision-making, well-being, and trust in credible information. These trends contribute to financial vulnerability, social polarization, and a broader erosion of confidence in democratic institutions and professional media. The project provides a collaborative learning environment where young content creators, educators, and media experts work together to develop relevant and engaging materials. Key activities include interactive workshops, the co-creation of multilingual micro-learning resources, the production of verified and accessible media content, and community-led challenges that invite young participants to evaluate and reframe online financial messaging.
By combining financial awareness, critical media literacy, and opportunities for creative expression, NoFakeFinance directly responds to the goals of CREA-CROSS-2026-MEDIALITERACY: fostering high-quality media literacy practices, supporting informed engagement in the digital public sphere, and strengthening a pluralistic, responsible, and sustainable European media ecosystem. The project aims to establish a transferable and open educational model that empowers young people to navigate digital media environments with confidence, autonomy, and resilience.
Completed projects:
The main research areas of our team are focused on enhancing organisational security, effectiveness, and resilience in the context of digital transformation. We work on projects that explore the use of blockchain technologies to prevent and combat fraud, the advancement of e-governance in the public sector and business, psychological support for employees during crisis and post-crisis periods, and innovations in the management of education and research organisations. Our publications.
Use of Blockchain Technologies to Protect Companies from Fraud
Purpose. To study the use of blockchain technologies as instruments for fraud prevention and detection in enterprises and institutions across different sectors.
The study “The Potential Use of Blockchain Technology in Corporate Governance” assesses the prospects for integrating blockchain solutions into corporate governance systems. The survey results indicate a positive attitude toward using blockchain to improve transparency, enhance shareholder voting, optimize governance processes, strengthen oversight, and support regulatory compliance. At the same time, technical complexity, regulatory uncertainty, and insufficient standardization remain the main barriers to adoption. The findings confirm the relevance of further research, pilot testing, and the development of practical models for integrating blockchain technology into corporate governance.
E-Governance in Public Administration and the Private Sector
Purpose. To analyse the use of e governance tools in public institutions and private business, with attention to organisational effectiveness, service quality, and accountability.
Within this research theme, attention was focused on the organisational and managerial factors that influence the effectiveness, transparency, and accountability of institutions and corporations. The study “The Role of Women’s Leadership in Corporate Governance” examined the impact of gender balance on corporate governance practices in corporations across different countries. The findings contributed to a better understanding of how women’s participation in leadership and decision-making can strengthen institutional governance, organisational responsibility, and management quality. The research was conducted jointly with LLC “Rating Agency MIRA”.
Psychological Support of Employees in the Crisis and Post-crisis Period
Purpose. To examine tools and methods for psychological support of employees in enterprises, organisations, and public institutions during crisis and post crisis periods.
The work completed within this theme addressed psychological well-being, emotional resilience, interpersonal relations, and institutional support in educational and professional environments. The study “Bullying Between University Teachers and Students” *1 assessed the prevalence and manifestations of bullying in universities across different countries.
The study “Students’ Emotional State and Burnout After Examinations” *2 examined emotional exhaustion among students during the educational process and evaluated the level of psychological support available at universities.
The study “Neuro-Well-being and Balance” *3 identified the main factors affecting human well-being in the digital era, with particular attention to psychological balance, digital pressure, and the conditions required to maintain personal resilience.
Together, these studies provided an evidence-based foundation for improving psychological support mechanisms, preventing destructive behaviour, and promoting healthier educational and professional environments. All studies were conducted jointly with LLC “Rating Agency
Innovations in the Development of Educational Management
Purpose. To study innovative tools and technologies in the management of education and scientific research, including organisational development and quality improvement practices.
Within this research theme, the completed work focused on innovative approaches to human resource management, competency assessment, professional interaction, safety education, and the quality of educational management.
The study “Social Intelligence in the Professional Environment” *1 assessed the level of social intelligence among employees representing different professional levels and sectors of the economy. Its results highlighted the importance of communication, empathy, adaptability, and interpersonal competence for effective professional interaction and organisational development.
The study “Digital Tools for Measuring the Competence of University Employees” *2 examined the level of digital literacy among university staff from different countries. The research demonstrated the importance of digital competencies and technology-based assessment tools for improving institutional performance, staff development, and the quality of educational management.
Collectively, these studies contributed to the development of innovative educational management practices based on digitalisation, competency measurement, social intelligence, institutional safety, and evidence-based decision-making. The studies were conducted jointly with LLC “Rating Agency MIRA”.